First Brexit and now Barbie. If nothing else I like to make my contributions to Rock My Style diverse. This feature was originally targeted solely at Rock My Family – Mabel’s Nana Debs had created various spectacular outfits for Mabel’s future collection of Barbie dolls. Subsequently I gave some consideration to the prospect of my daughter playing with/potentially aspiring to look like, Mattel’s iconic and global plastic phenomenon.

You can read more about my thoughts on the matter over on Rock My Family today. What I discovered from the associated research was frankly fascinating, and so I thought I would share with the Rock My Style community.

In the slider above you will see how Barbie’s initially pneumatic physique and facial details have changed from the 1960’s through to 2013. I wouldn’t call it dramatic by any stretch of the imagination, but with falling sales manufacturing giant Mattel have endeavoured to remodel the original 1957 blonde bombshell in recent years, with a wider waist and smaller bust being introduced in the 90’s and the addition of knickers and slightly peculiar hinged arms in 2013. Also is it me, or does the latest Barbie’s thigh gap seem even wider to you than ever before?

According to Medical Daily Barbie’s current measurements would leave her unable to lift her own head and she would be forced to walk on all fours. She would be 6ft tall, weigh 100 pounds and have a 39 inch bust, a 19 inch waist and 29 inch hips. I would hope that no young girl would ever aspire to those kinds of proportions, but then I would be naive and ignorant to ignore the fact that for decades, Barbie has been heralded as the ultimate American dream.

In 1963 Mattel introduced “Slumber Party Barbie”, not only was she accessorised with pink pyjamas and pink slippers, she also came with her own set of pink bathroom scales, set at 110 pounds. Oh and a “diet plan” that simply read “DON’T EAT”. I’m not even kidding.

Less than ten years ago, in 2007, Mattel introduced a “Growing Up Glam” line from their “My Scene” line of dolls (similar to Barbie but aimed at the tween market). You could turn a key in their back that would make them grow taller and…bustier. They did this even after pulling “Growing Up Skipper” from the shelves 30 years previously in 1975 due to (understandable) public outcry relating to Skipper’s similar body morphing ability (Skipper didn’t have a key, she was lucky enough to simply rotate her arm to increase her bra cup size).

In 2015 as a response to the increasing number of American children who are members of a minority ethnic group or race, Mattel released Barbies in seven new skin tones, 14 hairstyles, and bendable ankles so that the dolls could even wear flat shoes (!). This year sees Mattel introduce Barbies with three additional body shapes, “tall”, “petite” and “curvy”. Apparently the hashtag #theDollEvolves is part of the marketing campaign.You can have yourselves a butchers at the new models in the slider above.

When Adam and I went to Toys R US to buy a more recent Barbie for this feature (no 2 days at Rock My Ltd are ever the same you know), we found only super slender caucasian versions….perhaps the new models haven’t been released in the UK yet.

Representing more realistic shapes, sizes and skin tones can only be a positive move, but I wonder in the current climate, what with such easy access to various social media platforms full to bursting with real girls who have photoshopped/face-tuned/dieted to make themselves look like their perception of the female ideal, it’s all too little too late.

I’ve got to admit, the thought of Mabel being surrounded by this world that is seemingly dominated by celebrity and the way you look, fills me with fear.

Given the choice I would much rather she play make-believe with Barbie (yes, even the older more ridiculous version) than spend any time at all obsessing over the contents of Facebook.

Please please do discuss in the comments section below.

RESOURCES: medicaldaily.com | Fortune.com | entrepreneur.com